Marc J. Rachman is a partner in the Litigation and Intellectual Property Practice Groups of Davis & Gilbert. Mr. Rachman has represented clients in a wide variety of complex commercial litigations. His litigation practice focuses on intellectual property matters, including trademark and copyright infringement, false advertising, entertainment, domain name disputes, and trade secrets. Mr. Rachman has also handled disputes concerning complex commercial matters, the enforcement of advertising agency-client agreements, employment contracts and restrictive covenants and real estate disputes.
In counseling clients to avoid litigation, he has developed document retention policies and electronic media retention protocols in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other federal and state laws. Mr. Rachman has been lead and second chair trial counsel in both jury and bench trials and has argued appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the Ninth Circuit and the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court.
Mr. Rachman has been recognized as a leading lawyer for intellectual property: trademark & copyright law by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business (2014-2015). He has also been recognized by The Legal 500 U.S.(2012-2014) in the area of advertising and marketing, where his IP litigation strength was highlighted. He was also selected as a Super Lawyer by New York Metro Super Lawyers (2012-2015).
A federal district court in California has awarded a $2.7-million default judgment to Kim Kardashian West in her lawsuit against a fast fashion online retailer that allegedly used her persona and likeness to sell its clothing, in part by repeatedly tagging her on Instagram and linking to the retailer’s e-commerce site. Kardashian West’s suit is … Continue Reading
Over the past half-decade, Congress and the courts have made aggressive efforts to curb the worst abuses of the patent system. In 2013, Congress passed the America Invents Act (AIA), which established the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to hear patent validity challenges outside of the federal court system. In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling … Continue Reading
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently decided that agreements reached by 1-800 Contacts, Inc. with a number of its competitors to settle claims that the competitors’ online search advertising infringed on 1-800 Contacts’ trademarks unlawfully restricted the competitors’ ability to engage in search engine marketing, to the detriment of both consumers and search engines. The … Continue Reading
The legal protections afforded to graffiti and “street art” artists have gained increased visibility in recent months. But while street art may be entitled to certain protections under the law, not every use of street art without permission will violate an artist’s rights. A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District … Continue Reading
Unfortunately, the unauthorized use of a celebrity’s name and image has become a deceptive advertising practice frequently used by dishonest online marketers. This type of ad typically claims (falsely) that a public figure has used or endorsed what is billed as the latest miracle weight loss supplement or wrinkle-reducing cosmetic. Going after these bad actors … Continue Reading
Bottom Line: The Supreme Court’s decision sets the bar higher for design patent holders to recover for infringement and opens the door to apportionment of damages. Parties looking to file for design patents will likely consider claiming their patents more broadly, in order to avoid the specter of reduced damages in the event the design … Continue Reading
In a long-standing case brought against the video platform Vimeo by several music publishers, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently set the bar high for copyright owners to succeed in their infringement claims against service providers based on allegations of “red flag knowledge.” The Second Circuit, shedding some light on what is … Continue Reading
Fair use allows for the unauthorized copying of a copyrighted work in limited circumstances. Historically, examples of fair use have included copying for the purposes of criticism, comment, parody, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. Now the application of the fair use defense applies far beyond this. Two court decisions in 2015 illustrate the expanding … Continue Reading